Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2016-01-08 | 2023-04-04 |
| 5.70 x 2.80 x 0.29 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Interstellar Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a score of 83.4, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016)'s 71.9 general score. Motorola Edge 40 Pro's construction is noticeably newer, but notably heavier and thicker than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016). The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a larger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A5 (2016), because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 240 GB more internal storage capacity. Galaxy A5 (2016) has a much better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a much longer battery duration than Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a 4600mAh battery capacity against 2900mAh. Motorola Edge 40 Pro captures way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a way better 7680x4320 video definition, a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light photos and a camera with much more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.