Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-01-08 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.70 x 2.80 x 0.29 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has an overall score of 86.3, which is much better than Galaxy A5 (2016)'s overall score of 71.9. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro body is newer than the Galaxy A5 (2016)'s, although it's somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker. Galaxy A5 (2016) counts with a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a sharper screen than Galaxy A5 (2016), because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bigger display. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a way better camera than Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a much better resolution back facing camera, a way higher video resolution and a lot larger camera aperture to take better photography in low-light environments. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a 55 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.