Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-01-08 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.70 x 2.80 x 0.29 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| -- | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an overall score of 87.1, which is a lot better than the Galaxy A5 (2016)'s general score of 71.9. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a newer phone than the Galaxy A5 (2016), but it is thicker and noticeably heavier. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), because although it has a bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a larger display.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A5 (2016), because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Galaxy A5 (2016) features a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots greater photographs and videos than Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a bigger camera aperture for better captures and video in low light environments, a lot better (4K) video definition and a back facing camera with a much better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.