Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-01-08 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.70 x 2.80 x 0.29 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Smoke black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Power has a score of 76.1, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016)'s 71.9 overall score. Although the Moto G Power is incredibly newer than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), it is heavier and way thicker. The Motorola Moto G Power features a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A5 (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Motorola Moto G Power also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A5 (2016) has a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 1920 resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater pixels quantity per inch of screen. Motorola Moto G Power captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a bigger camera aperture for better images and videos in poorly lited situations, a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a better resolution back facing camera.
The Moto G Power has a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Moto G Power features a really longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 2900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.