Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2016-01-08 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.70 x 2.80 x 0.29 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Moto Z Force is a little bit better than Galaxy A5 (2016), having a general score of 75.8 against 71.9. Even though the Moto Z Force and Galaxy A5 (2016) were released with only 8 months difference, Moto Z Force's construction is just a bit heavier but a bit thinner. The Moto Z Force features a bit faster processor than Galaxy A5 (2016), because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory.
Motorola Moto Z Force features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a little bigger screen, a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater pixels number in each display inch. Motorola Moto Z Force has a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has 48 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Moto Z Force features greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2900mAh. Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light images, a camera with a way higher 21 megapixels resolution and a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.