Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2016-01-08 | 2019-05-15 |
| 5.70 x 2.80 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Blue and Brown |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Vision is better than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), having an 80.7 score against 71.9. The Motorola One Vision is a a lot newer phone than the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), although it is somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. The Motorola One Vision has a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2520 pixels, a quite higher screen pixels density and a bigger screen.
Motorola One Vision has a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola One Vision features a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A5 (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola One Vision also has more RAM.
The Motorola One Vision has better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a 3500mAh battery size. The Motorola One Vision shoots a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a larger aperture to capture better photos and videos in low-light situations, a much higher video definition and a way better 48 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.