Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-01-08 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.70 x 2.80 x 0.29 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is a lot better than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), getting an 87 score against 71.9. Motorola razr (2020)'s design is much newer, but a bit thicker and somewhat heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016). The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A5 (2016), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A5 (2016) has a little more vivid screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 1920px resolution and a little bit higher pixels number per inch of screen. The Motorola razr (2020) has a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 240 GB more internal memory.
The Galaxy A5 (2016) counts with a bit longer battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 2900mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a lot better video quality, a bigger aperture to capture better photos in low light environments and a back camera with a much higher 48 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.