Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 15 |
| 2016-01-08 | 2025-04-24 |
| 5.70 x 2.80 x 0.29 inches | -- |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | -- |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 424 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is much better than the Galaxy A5 (2016), getting a overall score of 79.2 against 71.9. Even though the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is much heavier than the Galaxy A5 (2016), it's incredibly thinner and also extremely newer. Galaxy A5 (2016) has a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016) features a lot better screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a way smaller screen. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) takes a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a back facing camera with way more mega pixels, a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a bigger aperture to take better low-light photography and video.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A5 (2016), because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a 62% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.