Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-01-08 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.70 x 2.80 x 0.29 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), with a 98.9 score against 71.9. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra construction is notably newer than the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016)'s, but it's notably heavier and just a little thicker. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a superior CPU than Galaxy A5 (2016), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a much bigger screen, a way better 1440 x 3088 resolution and a quite greater count of pixels per inch in the screen. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has 112 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a way higher 108 mega-pixels resolution back camera and a larger aperture. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much longer battery life than Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a 55% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.