Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2016-01-08 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.70 x 2.80 x 0.29 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 is way better than the Galaxy A5 (2016), having a 93.4 score against 71.9. Although the Galaxy S22 is newer than the Galaxy A5 (2016), it's just a bit heavier and just a little thicker. Galaxy S22 counts with a bit superior processor than Galaxy A5 (2016), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with an incredibly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), because although it has a just a bit inferior amount of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bigger display. Galaxy S22 counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A5 (2016), because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 112 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy S22 takes way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a back camera with a much higher resolution, a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution and a larger aperture for better low-light images and video. Galaxy S22 counts with superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity instead of 2900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.