Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2016-01-08 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.70 x 2.80 x 0.29 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a general score of 95.4, which is a lot better than the Galaxy A5 (2016)'s 71.9 global score. Galaxy S22 Ultra's design is extremely newer than Galaxy A5 (2016)'s, although it is somewhat thicker and incredibly heavier. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a bit better processing power than Galaxy A5 (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has 6 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a just a little better amount of pixels per inch of screen, a way bigger screen and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3088px. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a bigger camera aperture to capture better images and videos in low-light environments, a camera in the back with a way better resolution and a way higher video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a really longer battery life than Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.