Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-01-08 | -- |
| 5.70 x 2.80 x 0.29 inches | -- |
| 5.47 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | -- |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has an overall score of 90.7, which is way better than Galaxy A5 (2016)'s 71.9 score. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra construction is much thinner and way lighter than Galaxy A5 (2016). The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a way better display than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a really bigger display, a much better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a little better display density.
Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016) features a lot better processing power than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a lot better camera than Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a much higher video definition, a lot more megapixels camera and a larger aperture to take better images in poorly lited environments.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much greater memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.