Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2016-01-08 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.70 x 2.80 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 424 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is better than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), having an 80.1 score against 71.9. Even though the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is notably newer than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), it is notably heavier and way thicker. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little bit better performance than Galaxy A5 (2016), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has 2 GB more RAM. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a lot bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 48 GB more internal memory.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a 4500mAh battery size. Galaxy A5 (2016) takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a much tinier camera aperture which is worse for low light photos and video, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Galaxy A5 (2016) also counts with a better resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.