Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-01-08 | 2020-08-07 |
| 5.70 x 2.80 x 0.29 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a lot better than the Galaxy A5 (2016), having a 92.3 score against 71.9. Even though Galaxy Z Flip 5G is heavier than the Galaxy A5 (2016), it's a little thinner and also much newer. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a little bit better screen than Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2636px, a just a bit better pixels amount in each screen inch and a larger screen.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a quite better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G captures much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), because although it has a lower resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better low-light photography and a lot higher video definition.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features just a little better battery performance than Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a 14% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.