Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-01-08 | 2021-04-20 |
| 5.70 x 2.80 x 0.29 inches | 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Marine Blue and Moondust Gray |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The TCL 20 Pro 5G has a general score of 76.1, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A5 (2016)'s 71.9 score. Although the TCL 20 Pro 5G is much newer than the Galaxy A5 (2016), it's somewhat heavier and thicker. The TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with a little better processing power than Galaxy A5 (2016), and although they both have the same number of cores, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016) features just a bit better display than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better number of pixels per inch in the display. TCL 20 Pro 5G features a much better storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has more internal storage and a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with a much longer battery duration than Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. TCL 20 Pro 5G captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels and a bigger aperture to take better captures and video in low light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.