Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-01-08 | 2019-08-20 |
| 5.70 x 2.80 x 0.29 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a score of 82.7, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016)'s 71.9 score. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro's design is a lot newer than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016)'s, although it is somewhat thicker and heavier. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a greater processing power than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has more RAM.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A5 (2016), because although it has a little less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a larger screen. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with much more storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A5 (2016), because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 112 GB more internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a way better camera than Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a larger diafragm aperture, a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a camera with lot more mega-pixels. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a really longer battery life than Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a 38 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.