Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2017-01-13 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.61 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has an overall score of 81.9, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A5 (2017)'s global score of 75.8. Google Pixel 4 is a extremely newer phone than the Galaxy A5 (2017), but it is a little bit heavier and just a bit thicker. The Google Pixel 4 has a slightly better display than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a little bit better pixels quantity per inch in the screen, a little larger display and a quite better 1080 x 2280 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) counts with more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB. The Google Pixel 4 has a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A5 (2017) features just a bit better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 3000mAh battery size instead of 2800mAh. The Google Pixel 4 has a slightly better camera than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has a lot less megapixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video definition and a bigger camera aperture for better captures and video in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.