Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-01-13 | 2021-06-25 |
| 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.61 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| Glass and Metal | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 17.00mm focal length |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Honor 50 Pro has a general score of 77, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017)'s general score of 75.8. Honor 50 Pro's design has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), but it is somewhat heavier. The Honor 50 Pro has a little faster processor than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Honor 50 Pro also has more RAM.
Honor 50 Pro features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a bigger screen, a little bit better amount of pixels per display inch and a higher 1236 x 2676px resolution. The Honor 50 Pro counts with a way bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Honor 50 Pro counts with better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3000mAh. Honor 50 Pro shoots greater photos and videos than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have the same aperture, the Honor 50 Pro also has a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.