Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-01-13 | 2020-11-06 |
| 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.61 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Titan gray |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG K92 is better than the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), getting a overall score of 85.4 against 75.8. Even though LG K92 is incredibly newer than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), it is a little thicker and heavier. The LG K92 counts with a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG K92 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy A5 (2017) has a little bit better display than LG K92, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a little greater display density. LG K92 takes a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality, a larger camera aperture to take better photos and video in poorly lited environments and a lot higher resolution camera in the back.
LG K92 has a superior memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has 96 GB more internal storage and a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG K92 has superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 33% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.