Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| 2017-01-13 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.61 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Black and Gray |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017)'s score of 75.8. LG V35 ThinQ is a newer phone, and it is also a bit lighter and just a little bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017). The LG V35 ThinQ has just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a slightly better looking display than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a better pixel density, a larger display and a much higher 1440 x 2880 resolution. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have a 16 megapixels camera, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a bigger camera aperture to capture better photos in low light situations.
LG V35 ThinQ has a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has 64 GB internal memory and an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ features just a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.