Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-01-13 | 2020-03-20 |
| 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.61 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Blue and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 9.24 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ has a score of 87.6, which is better than the Galaxy A5 (2017)'s general score of 75.8. LG V60 ThinQ's design is notably newer, but incredibly heavier and thicker than the Galaxy A5 (2017). LG V60 ThinQ counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a screen that is very similar to the display in Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because although the LG V60 ThinQ has a little less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution and a way larger display. LG V60 ThinQ has a superior camera than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video definition, a larger diafragm aperture and a much more MP back facing camera.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. LG V60 ThinQ features a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.