Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2017-01-13 | 2021-08-19 |
| 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.61 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a score of 92.8, which is way better than the Galaxy A5 (2017)'s overall score of 75.8. Motorola Edge 20 Pro is a heavier phone than the Galaxy A5 (2017), but they are equally thin. Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has a quite lower display density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bigger display.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a superior processor than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has more RAM memory. Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a much better storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3000mAh. Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a very superior camera than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have a F1.9 diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has a lot better resolution camera in the back and a much higher video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.