Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2017-01-13 | 2022-09-08 |
| 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.61 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra is just a bit better than the Galaxy A5 (2017), getting a overall score of 80.9 against 75.8. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's body is newer than the Galaxy A5 (2017)'s, although it is just a bit thicker and heavier. Galaxy A5 (2017) counts with a much faster processing unit than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has 5 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a larger number of faster cores.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has a just a little lower count of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bigger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a greater camera than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have a F1.9 aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra also has a way better 7680x4320 video resolution and a lot higher 200 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a quite bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a much longer battery duration than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.