Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-01-13 | 2024-08-29 |
| 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.61 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a global score of 81.9, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A5 (2017)'s 75.8 general score. Motorola Edge 50 Neo's construction is incredibly newer, but just a bit thicker and a bit heavier than the Galaxy A5 (2017). Galaxy A5 (2017) has a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has 5 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a way better looking display than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a bit more pixels per screen inch, a better resolution of 1256 x 2760px and a larger screen. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 44 percent larger battery capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a much better camera than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a larger camera aperture for better photography and videos in low-light environments, a lot better video quality and a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.