Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-01-13 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.61 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is better than the Galaxy A5 (2017), having a general score of 86.3 against 75.8. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro design is newer than Galaxy A5 (2017)'s, but it is a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a more vivid screen than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has a just a bit lower display pixels density, it also counts with a bigger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The Galaxy A5 (2017) counts with a way better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a very superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a very superior battery performance than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a way better camera than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition, a back facing camera with a lot better 50 MP resolution and a way bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.