Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-01-13 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.61 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is better than the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), having a score of 87.1 against 75.8. Even though the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is newer than the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), it's a little thicker and heavier. Galaxy A5 (2017) counts with a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a better looking screen than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has a just a little inferior count of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bigger display. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a lot better video definition, a lot better resolution back-facing camera and a bigger camera aperture.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a very superior storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.