Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-01-13 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.61 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Smoke black |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G Power is a little bit better than Galaxy A5 (2017), getting a overall score of 76.1 against 75.8. Even though the Motorola Moto G Power is noticeably newer than Galaxy A5 (2017), it is thicker and much heavier. Galaxy A5 (2017) counts with a little bit better display than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 1920, it also counts with a bit greater pixel density.
Moto G Power counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Moto G Power also has a greater amount of RAM. The Moto G Power has a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Moto G Power counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have a same resolution camera, the Moto G Power also has a bigger aperture and a way better (4K) video quality. Moto G Power counts with a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 67 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.