Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2017-01-13 | 2021-01-14 |
| 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.61 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Aurora black and Aurora white |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) has a global score of 79.3, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A5 (2017)'s 75.8 overall score. Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021)'s design is notably newer than the Galaxy A5 (2017)'s, although it is much heavier and somewhat thicker. The Moto G Stylus (2021) counts with a bit faster processor than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Moto G Stylus (2021) also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) has a little more vivid screen than Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a much smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px, it also counts with a bit higher display density. Moto G Stylus (2021) shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a bigger camera aperture, a camera with lot more mega pixels and a much better video resolution.
The Moto G Stylus (2021) features a much better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB and 96 GB more internal memory. The Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) has superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.