Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-01-13 | 2021-11-18 |
| 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.61 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Glass and Metal | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Moto G200 5G is much better than the Galaxy A5 (2017), with a score of 86.2 against 75.8. The Moto G200 5G body is notably newer, but somewhat thicker and much heavier than Galaxy A5 (2017). Moto G200 5G has just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Moto G200 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) and the Moto G200 5G feature extremely similar screens, because although the Moto G200 5G has a just a little worse number of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2460 resolution and a lot bigger screen. Moto G200 5G features a way better camera than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have a F1.9 aperture, the Moto G200 5G also has a way better video resolution and a much more megapixels camera.
Motorola Moto G200 5G has a bigger memory to install games and applications than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Moto G200 5G has a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.