Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-01-13 | 2019-12-04 |
| 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.61 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper is slightly better than Galaxy A5 (2017), getting a global score of 79.8 against 75.8. The Motorola One Hyper design is newer, but thicker and incredibly heavier than Galaxy A5 (2017). Motorola One Hyper features a bit superior processor than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Motorola One Hyper also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A5 (2017) has just a bit better looking display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a lot smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a little higher display density. The Motorola One Hyper has a way bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and 96 GB more internal storage.
Motorola One Hyper captures way better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have a same size aperture, the Motorola One Hyper also has a way better video resolution and a much more mega pixels camera. The Motorola One Hyper features superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.