Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2017-01-13 | 2019-05-15 |
| 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.61 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Blue and Brown |
| Glass and Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Vision is slightly better than the Galaxy A5 (2017), having a score of 80.7 against 75.8. Motorola One Vision's body is way newer than the Galaxy A5 (2017)'s, although it is a little thicker and somewhat heavier. The Motorola One Vision has a bit better CPU than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola One Vision also has 1 GB more RAM memory.
The Motorola One Vision counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a little bit greater quantity of pixels per inch in the display, a larger display and a slightly better 1080 x 2520px resolution. The Motorola One Vision features a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB and 96 GB more internal memory capacity.
Motorola One Vision has a bit longer battery life than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 3500mAh battery size against 3000mAh. Motorola One Vision shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light images and videos, a much better 3840x2160 video definition and a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.