Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2017-01-13 | 2019-09-05 |
| 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.61 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Zoom has an overall score of 80, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A5 (2017)'s 75.8 score. Motorola One Zoom's design is much newer, but thicker and heavier than the Galaxy A5 (2017). Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) has a bit sharper screen than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better pixel density.
The Motorola One Zoom has a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola One Zoom also has a higher amount of RAM. The Motorola One Zoom shoots greater photos and videos than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a back-facing camera with way more megapixels, a much better video definition and a bigger diafragm aperture for better images in poorly lited situations.
The Motorola One Zoom has a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 128 GB against 256 GB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola One Zoom counts with superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 33 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.