Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-01-13 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.61 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has a score of 87, which is better than Galaxy A5 (2017)'s global score of 75.8. Motorola razr (2020)'s construction has the same thickness than the Galaxy A5 (2017), but it's heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 1920px resolution and a bit higher display pixels density.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Motorola razr (2020) shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a larger camera aperture for better photography and video in low light environments, a lot better video definition and a camera with lot more megapixels.
The Motorola razr (2020) has much more storage to install applications and games than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) counts with a little longer battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 7 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.