Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 15 |
| 2017-01-13 | 2025-04-24 |
| 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.61 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | -- |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | -- |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 424 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is just a bit better than Galaxy A5 (2017), having a overall score of 79.2 against 75.8. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s design is incredibly newer and a lot thinner than Galaxy A5 (2017)'s, but it is incredibly heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) has a much better looking display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a way smaller display.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 480 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy A5 (2017) has a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a very superior battery performance than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a much better camera than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a way more megapixels camera, a way better 7680x4320 video resolution and a bigger aperture to take better images and videos in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.