Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-01-13 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.61 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Ocean |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Pro is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), getting a global score of 83.1 against 75.8. OPPO Find X2 Pro's construction is incredibly newer, but thicker and a lot heavier than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017). OPPO Find X2 Pro features a little faster processor than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a much better looking screen than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a bigger screen, a lot higher 1440 x 3168 resolution and a just a little higher pixels density. OPPO Find X2 Pro has a much bigger memory to install games and applications than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
OPPO Find X2 Pro shoots much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a way better (4K) video definition, a much higher resolution camera and a bigger aperture. OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has 4260mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.