Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-01-13 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.61 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Glass and Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), with a global score of 98.9 against 75.8. Although the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is noticeably newer than the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), it is just a little bit thicker and much heavier. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit better performance than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a really larger display, a way better resolution of 1440 x 3088 and a little greater screen pixels density. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features much more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a way better battery duration than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a bigger camera aperture for better captures and videos in poorly lited situations, a way more mega pixels camera in the back and a much higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.