Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-01-13 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.61 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than the Galaxy A5 (2017), with a score of 98 against 75.8. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G construction is extremely newer than the Galaxy A5 (2017)'s, but it's a lot heavier and somewhat thicker. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a quite greater pixel number in each display inch, a way better 1440 x 3200 resolution and a way bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit faster processor than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a lot better camera than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a lot higher resolution back camera, a way better video quality and a bigger aperture to capture better low-light photography.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a very superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 67 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.