Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-01-13 | -- |
| 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.61 ounces | -- |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | -- |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 has a general score of 82.6, which is slightly better than Galaxy A5 (2017)'s overall score of 75.8. The Samsung Galaxy S25 body is incredibly thinner and notably lighter than the Galaxy A5 (2017). Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) has a much better performing processor than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Galaxy S25 has a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has a little bit lower count of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a larger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2340px resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S25 has a greater storage for games and applications than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 captures way better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a way more mega pixels camera in the back, a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a bigger aperture. The Galaxy S25 counts with longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 33% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.