Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-01-13 | -- |
| 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.61 ounces | -- |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | -- |
| Glass and Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a score of 90.7, which is better than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017)'s score of 75.8. Galaxy S25 Ultra is a much thinner and incredibly lighter cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017). The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a lot better looking screen than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a little bit higher display density, a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a really bigger screen.
Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) features an extremely better processing unit than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a larger camera aperture to take better low light images and video, a back camera with a lot better resolution and a way better video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.