Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2017-01-13 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.61 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Black |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 424 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), getting a overall score of 80.1 against 75.8. Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is incredibly newer than the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), it is notably thicker and noticeably heavier. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit better looking display than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a better pixel amount in each inch in the screen.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit better processing power than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has 1 GB more RAM. Galaxy A5 (2017) takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lot tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Galaxy A5 (2017) also counts with a way better resolution back facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has more internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.