Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-01-13 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.61 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a general score of 88.5, which is much better than Galaxy A5 (2017)'s 75.8 score. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip design is notably newer and just a little thinner, but also heavier than the Galaxy A5 (2017). The Galaxy Z Flip features a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy Z Flip features a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a bigger screen, a little bit higher quantity of pixels in each inch in the display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels. The Galaxy Z Flip has a much better camera than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has a camera with a much lower resolution, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light images.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a little better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 3300mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.