Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-01-13 | 2020-08-07 |
| 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.61 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is way better than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), having a 92.3 score against 75.8. Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a noticeably newer and just a little thinner phone than the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), but it's also heavier. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a larger display, a bit higher 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution and a bit better screen density.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has a camera in the back with lot less MP resolution, it also counts with a way better video quality and a larger camera aperture. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.