Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-01-13 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.61 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is a lot better than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017)'s 75.8 global score. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), it's somewhat thinner and also a lot newer. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a screen that is just as good as the screen in Galaxy A5 (2017), because although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit lower amount of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1768 x 2208px and a way larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a better camera than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has a lot lower 12 mega pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a much higher video resolution and a larger camera aperture to capture better images in poorly lited environments. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much longer battery performance than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.