Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-01-13 | -- |
| 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.61 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | -- |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is better than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), having a global score of 86.1 against 75.8. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is a extremely heavier and a little thicker device than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017). Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a bigger screen, a just a little greater screen density and a way better resolution of 2080 x 2400 pixels.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro takes much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have a F1.9 camera aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also has a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a back camera with a lot higher 108 megapixels resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a better memory for games and applications than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 72 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.