Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-01-13 | -- |
| 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.61 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), having a general score of 77.1 against 75.8. Although it's the best in this review, Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is a incredibly heavier and just a little thicker phone than the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017). The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a better looking display than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a little greater display pixels density, a much better 2080 x 2400 resolution and a bigger screen.
Galaxy A5 (2017) features a much faster processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features much more memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has an external SD slot that allows up to 1 TB and more internal memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a very superior battery duration than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 67 percent larger battery capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G shoots much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also has a lot better (4K) video definition and a camera in the back with a lot higher 108 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.