Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2019-03-15 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black, Green, Purple, Red, White and Yellow |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3110mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 has a score of 83.8, which is slightly better than Apple iPhone 11's 83.3 general score. Although Galaxy A50 and Apple iPhone 11 were released only 6 months apart, Galaxy A50 is somewhat lighter and a little thinner. IPhone 11 counts with a better performing processor than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the iPhone 11 also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
The Apple iPhone 11 has a bit sharper display than Galaxy A50, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a lot lower resolution of 828 x 1792px and a bit worse screen pixel density. Galaxy A50 counts with a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Apple iPhone 11, because it has more internal storage and a SD card slot that admits up to 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has better battery performance than Apple iPhone 11, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3110mAh. IPhone 11 counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a way less megapixels resolution camera in the back and a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for shooting photographs or video in low light situations, it also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a lot better (4K) video definition.
Galaxy A50 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.