Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2019-03-15 | 2020-10-23 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.66 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone 12 Pro is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A50, getting a 92.8 score against 83.8. The iPhone 12 Pro design is newer and a little thinner, but also heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A50. The iPhone 12 Pro has a quite better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has 2 less cpu cores , it also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory and a 64-bit processor.
IPhone 12 Pro has a sharper screen than Galaxy A50, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1170 x 2532 pixels and a just a little more pixels per inch of display. The Galaxy A50 counts with a very superior storage for applications and games than iPhone 12 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A50 also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy A50 features a much longer battery performance than iPhone 12 Pro, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 2815mAh. The Galaxy A50 counts with just a bit better camera than Apple iPhone 12 Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking photos or video in low light environments and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Galaxy A50 also counts with a much higher 25 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
Although Apple iPhone 12 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy A50, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A50. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Apple iPhone 12 Pro, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Galaxy A50, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.