Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 91.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2019-03-15 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Blue, Midnight, Pink, Red and Starlight |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3227mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 has an overall score of 91.5, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A50's general score of 83.8. IPhone 13's design has the same thickness than Galaxy A50, but it's just a little heavier. The Apple iPhone 13 features a more powerful CPU than Galaxy A50, because although it has lesser processing cores (although faster), and they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Apple iPhone 13 also counts with a 64-bits processor.
IPhone 13 has a sharper screen than Galaxy A50, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1170 x 2532px and a just a little more pixels per inch of display. Galaxy A50 features a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Apple iPhone 13, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy A50 also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A50 features improved battery performance than Apple iPhone 13, because it has a 24% larger battery size. The Galaxy A50 shoots clearer photos and videos than Apple iPhone 13, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low light captures and video and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Galaxy A50 also counts with a back facing camera with much more MP.
Although iPhone 13 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A50, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy A50. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy A50, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.