Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2019-03-15 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 13 Pro has a general score of 93.3, which is better than the Galaxy A50's 83.8 global score. Apple iPhone 13 Pro's construction has the same thickness than Galaxy A50, but it is heavier. IPhone 13 Pro features a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit greater number of pixels in each inch of display and a quite better resolution of 1170 x 2532.
The iPhone 13 Pro counts with a superior performance than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit and a larger amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A50 has just a bit better camera than iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light images and video, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with much more memory for apps and games than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A50 features superior battery life than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3095mAh.
Although iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than Samsung Galaxy A50, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy A50. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get Samsung Galaxy A50, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.