Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2019-03-15 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 Pro Max is much better than Samsung Galaxy A50, with a overall score of 93.2 against 83.8. IPhone 13 Pro Max's design has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy A50, but it is incredibly heavier. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has a better performing CPU than Galaxy A50, because although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a larger amount of RAM and a 64 bits processor.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a quite greater pixels density, a little larger display and a higher 1284 x 2778 resolution. Galaxy A50 features a slightly better camera than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not good for taking pictures in low-light situations, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Galaxy A50 also counts with a much better resolution camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy A50 has a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than iPhone 13 Pro Max, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB. IPhone 13 Pro Max counts with just a little better battery duration than Galaxy A50, because it has a 4352mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Although Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy A50, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A50. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Galaxy A50, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.